Latest Issue
ISSN : 2581-5148

Title:
PEER-COUNSELLING MODELS IN BOARDING SECONDARY SCHOOLS: IMPLEMENTATION ACROSS SCHOOL TYPES AND CATEGORIES IN BUNGOMA COUNTY, KENYA

Authors:
Indimuli Harrison Munala, Dr. Shikuku Musima Mulambula and Dr. Ngeno Godfrey

Abstract:
Boarding secondary schools remove adolescents from family support structures for extended periods, and peer counselling is widely expected to substitute for that loss. Yet in Kenya the models through which peer counselling is delivered have never been mapped empirically and schools continue to sustain programmes whose comparative structure and adequacy are unknown. This study examined the peer-counselling models implemented across school types and categories in boarding secondary schools in Bungoma County, Kenya. Anchored on Social Support Theory (Cohen & Wills, 1985) and adopting a pragmatic paradigm, the study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods design within a descriptive survey framework. Two-stage stratified sampling drew 15 schools from a population of 60; cluster and simple random sampling yielded 300 learners in Grade 10, Form Three and Form Four; and purposive sampling secured interviews with ten deputy principals. Data were generated through a 47-item learner questionnaire, a semi-structured interview schedule, a document analysis checklist and an observation checklist, and were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation and dummy-variable regression in IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26), together with thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke (2006). All four models were implemented at high to very high levels, with the Peer Support Group Model highest (M = 4.357, SD = .682) and significantly more extensive than the Helper/Peer Mentor (M = 4.070), Peer Leadership (M = 4.063) and Peer Education (M = 4.038) models, all p < .001. Only two models, however, predominated in practice: dyadic mentoring for 59.0% of learners and group support for 40.0%. Implementation differed significantly by school type, which accounted for 23.0% to 41.6% of the variance (all p < .001), but not by school category (R² < .02, all p > .05). The null hypothesis was therefore rejected for school type and retained for school category. No deputy principal described a formally named model, and three uncoordinated selection logics operated across schools. Peer counselling in the county is thus extensive in reach but unstandardised in design, shaped by gender composition and administrative convenience rather than by learner need. The study recommends a county-wide model framework, competency-based selection, supervised training and a formal referral pathway.

Keywords:
peer counselling; peer-counselling models; socio-emotional well-being; learner discipline; boarding secondary schools; Social Support Theory; Bungoma County, Kenya

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37500/IJESSR.2026.9506

Date of Publication: 21-09-2026

PDF Download

Download Certificate